P5 V4 baseline

SF at LAR

Thursday, September 10 · 7:35 PM CDT

SF 23.3 — LAR 26.0

LAR slight edge · LAR 53.9%

Projected total 49.3 · Confidence: limited evidence

PardonMe projects LAR slight edge.
Why PardonMe leans LAR →

Current expectation and observed workload are distinct: Official current depth is available for 2 of 2 clubs; 103 current-depth players have prior observed F2 role evidence and 28 were at least 50% offense/defense snap players in their latest supported observation. None is treated as a current snap-confirmed starter.

Player stat models

Player projections

Existing QB, RB, WR and TE statistical models. Each line shows mean · median · 80% range.

Quarterback ranges

Matthew Stafford · LAR

Attempts
33.8 mean · 34.0 median · 25.0–44.0 80%
Completions
21.7 mean · 21.0 median · 15.0–29.0 80%
Passing yards
255 mean · 259 median · 130–368 80%
Passing TD
2.02 mean · 85% 1+
Interceptions
0.74 mean · 52% 1+
Medium uncertainty

Brock Purdy · SF

Attempts
34.5 mean · 35.0 median · 28.0–42.0 80%
Completions
22.8 mean · 23.0 median · 17.0–29.0 80%
Passing yards
253 mean · 246 median · 141–333 80%
Passing TD
2.01 mean · 86% 1+
Interceptions
0.80 mean · 54% 1+
Medium uncertainty

Running back ranges

Blake Corum · LAR

Opportunities
11.6 mean · 13.0 median · 6.0–16.0 80%
Carries
10.5 mean · 11.0 median · 5.0–15.0 80%
Targets
1.1 mean · 1.0 median · 0.0–3.0 80%
Rushing yards
50 mean · 46 median · 22–84 80%
Receptions
0.9 mean · 1.0 median · 0.0–2.0 80%
Receiving yards
6 mean · 6 median · 0–15 80%
Total TD
32% 1+
Medium

Kyren Williams · LAR

Opportunities
16.4 mean · 15.0 median · 11.0–25.0 80%
Carries
13.9 mean · 13.0 median · 9.0–22.0 80%
Targets
2.5 mean · 2.0 median · 1.0–5.0 80%
Rushing yards
66 mean · 63 median · 38–102 80%
Receptions
1.9 mean · 2.0 median · 0.0–4.0 80%
Receiving yards
14 mean · 14 median · 0–30 80%
Total TD
43% 1+
High

Jordan James · SF

Opportunities
11.4 mean · 11.0 median · 3.0–21.0 80%
Carries
9.2 mean · 8.0 median · 2.0–17.0 80%
Targets
2.2 mean · 2.0 median · 0.0–5.0 80%
Rushing yards
39 mean · 35 median · 10–75 80%
Receptions
1.7 mean · 1.0 median · 0.0–4.0 80%
Receiving yards
13 mean · 8 median · 0–30 80%
Total TD
29% 1+
Insufficient Evidence

Christian McCaffrey · SF

Opportunities
21.2 mean · 22.0 median · 11.0–31.0 80%
Carries
15.9 mean · 16.0 median · 7.0–24.0 80%
Targets
5.3 mean · 5.0 median · 2.0–9.0 80%
Rushing yards
66 mean · 64 median · 29–103 80%
Receptions
4.3 mean · 4.0 median · 1.0–8.0 80%
Receiving yards
34 mean · 32 median · 8–63 80%
Total TD
52% 1+
High

Receiver and tight end ranges

Davis Allen · LAR · TE

Targets
3.6 mean · 3.0 median · 2.0–6.0 80%
Receptions
2.6 mean · 2.0 median · 1.0–5.0 80%
Receiving yards
24 mean · 19 median · 9–46 80%
Receiving TD
16% 1+
Medium

Colby Parkinson · LAR · TE

Targets
4.3 mean · 4.0 median · 2.0–7.0 80%
Receptions
3.3 mean · 3.0 median · 1.0–6.0 80%
Receiving yards
33 mean · 30 median · 10–61 80%
Receiving TD
26% 1+
High

Davante Adams · LAR · WR

Targets
6.3 mean · 7.0 median · 4.0–8.0 80%
Receptions
3.5 mean · 4.0 median · 1.0–6.0 80%
Receiving yards
45 mean · 51 median · 13–76 80%
Receiving TD
45% 1+
High

Puka Nacua · LAR · WR

Targets
9.0 mean · 10.0 median · 3.0–12.0 80%
Receptions
6.5 mean · 7.0 median · 2.0–10.0 80%
Receiving yards
90 mean · 97 median · 28–138 80%
Receiving TD
43% 1+
High

Jordan Whittington · LAR · WR

Targets
2.7 mean · 3.0 median · 1.0–4.0 80%
Receptions
1.9 mean · 2.0 median · 0.0–4.0 80%
Receiving yards
22 mean · 24 median · 0–48 80%
Receiving TD
10% 1+
Medium

George Kittle · SF · TE

Targets
6.7 mean · 6.0 median · 3.0–10.0 80%
Receptions
5.4 mean · 5.0 median · 2.0–9.0 80%
Receiving yards
59 mean · 55 median · 22–99 80%
Receiving TD
33% 1+
High

Jake Tonges · SF · TE

Targets
3.5 mean · 2.0 median · 0.0–8.0 80%
Receptions
2.5 mean · 2.0 median · 0.0–6.0 80%
Receiving yards
23 mean · 18 median · 0–54 80%
Receiving TD
18% 1+
Medium

Mike Evans · SF · WR

Targets
7.1 mean · 8.0 median · 1.0–11.0 80%
Receptions
4.2 mean · 4.0 median · 1.0–7.0 80%
Receiving yards
54 mean · 51 median · 13–90 80%
Receiving TD
34% 1+
High

Demarcus Robinson · SF · WR

Targets
3.5 mean · 3.0 median · 2.0–5.0 80%
Receptions
2.3 mean · 2.0 median · 1.0–4.0 80%
Receiving yards
28 mean · 24 median · 12–49 80%
Receiving TD
16% 1+
High

De'Zhaun Stribling · SF · WR

Targets
4.8 mean · 4.0 median · 1.0–9.0 80%
Receptions
3.0 mean · 2.0 median · 1.0–6.0 80%
Receiving yards
38 mean · 25 median · 13–76 80%
Receiving TD
21% 1+
Insufficient Evidence

14 individualized projections · 2 baseline projections. Projected role and prior usage remain separate.

Players ruled out or suppressed by current injury and availability evidence are not projected. Player ranges are not produced by, and do not sum to, the PA-1 team scores.

Model comparison

PardonMe Unified

Best historical score model

Unified unavailable — P5 baseline shown.

Full Football

Personnel-aware football model

Full Football unavailable.

P5 V4 baseline

Previous production baseline

SF 23.3 — LAR 26.0

LAR · 53.9% win probability

Margin
LAR 2.7
Total
49.3

As of Sep 11, 2026 12:00 UTC

Current personnel

Expected lineup & depth

Expected order for this game, using official depth and supported availability.

SFWeek 1 expected order

No supported expected lineup snapshot is available for this game.

LARWeek 1 expected order

No supported expected lineup snapshot is available for this game.

PardonMe is still being built. Projections are independent of sportsbook lines, and missing information remains visible.

Overview

Game comparisonSFLAR
Projected points23.326.0
Win probability46.1%53.9%
Depth chartNot confirmed yetNot confirmed yet
Current status68 updates58 updates

Matchup context

Current expectation and observed workload are distinct

Official current depth is available for 2 of 2 clubs; 103 current-depth players have prior observed F2 role evidence and 28 were at least 50% offense/defense snap players in their latest supported observation. None is treated as a current snap-confirmed starter.

LAR recent scoring form vs SF prevention

2025 final-three scoring average 32.7; opponent allowed 26.0.

SF recent scoring form vs LAR prevention

2025 final-three scoring average 31.0; opponent allowed 28.3.