PardonMe Unified

NO at DET

Sunday, September 13 · 12:00 PM CDT

NO 19.4 — DET 23.6

DET edge · DET 60.3%

Projected total 43.1 · Confidence: low

PardonMe projects DET edge.
Player stat models

Player projections

Existing QB, RB, WR and TE statistical models. Each line shows mean · median · 80% range.

Quarterback ranges

Jared Goff · DET

Attempts
34.0 mean · 33.0 median · 24.0–43.0 80%
Completions
21.8 mean · 21.0 median · 14.0–30.0 80%
Passing yards
251 mean · 248 median · 157–330 80%
Passing TD
1.55 mean · 77% 1+
Interceptions
0.72 mean · 50% 1+
Medium uncertainty

Tyler Shough · NO

Attempts
28.9 mean · 28.0 median · 16.0–40.0 80%
Completions
19.2 mean · 19.0 median · 11.0–28.0 80%
Passing yards
212 mean · 220 median · 115–284 80%
Passing TD
1.13 mean · 66% 1+
Interceptions
0.60 mean · 45% 1+
Low uncertainty

Running back ranges

Jahmyr Gibbs · DET

Opportunities
15.8 mean · 17.0 median · 8.0–21.0 80%
Carries
11.5 mean · 12.0 median · 5.0–16.0 80%
Targets
4.4 mean · 4.0 median · 1.0–7.0 80%
Rushing yards
54 mean · 50 median · 21–92 80%
Receptions
3.4 mean · 3.0 median · 1.0–6.0 80%
Receiving yards
28 mean · 26 median · 7–52 80%
Total TD
45% 1+
High

Sione Vaki · DET

Opportunities
7.5 mean · 6.0 median · 0.0–16.0 80%
Carries
6.0 mean · 5.0 median · 0.0–13.0 80%
Targets
1.5 mean · 1.0 median · 0.0–4.0 80%
Rushing yards
26 mean · 21 median · 0–59 80%
Receptions
1.2 mean · 1.0 median · 0.0–3.0 80%
Receiving yards
9 mean · 7 median · 0–23 80%
Total TD
20% 1+
Insufficient Evidence

Travis Etienne Jr. · NO

Opportunities
15.4 mean · 17.0 median · 9.0–20.0 80%
Carries
12.7 mean · 13.0 median · 7.0–18.0 80%
Targets
2.7 mean · 2.0 median · 1.0–5.0 80%
Rushing yards
49 mean · 48 median · 23–75 80%
Receptions
2.0 mean · 2.0 median · 0.0–4.0 80%
Receiving yards
17 mean · 16 median · 0–34 80%
Total TD
41% 1+
High

Alvin Kamara · NO

Opportunities
12.7 mean · 12.0 median · 5.0–23.0 80%
Carries
9.8 mean · 9.0 median · 3.0–18.0 80%
Targets
3.0 mean · 3.0 median · 0.0–6.0 80%
Rushing yards
37 mean · 34 median · 13–67 80%
Receptions
2.4 mean · 2.0 median · 0.0–5.0 80%
Receiving yards
17 mean · 15 median · 0–36 80%
Total TD
28% 1+
High

Receiver and tight end ranges

Sam LaPorta · DET · TE

Targets
5.6 mean · 6.0 median · 3.0–8.0 80%
Receptions
4.4 mean · 4.0 median · 2.0–7.0 80%
Receiving yards
50 mean · 45 median · 23–80 80%
Receiving TD
26% 1+
High

Brock Wright · DET · TE

Targets
3.5 mean · 3.0 median · 2.0–7.0 80%
Receptions
2.4 mean · 2.0 median · 1.0–4.0 80%
Receiving yards
21 mean · 18 median · 9–35 80%
Receiving TD
18% 1+
High

Amon-Ra St. Brown · DET · WR

Targets
9.0 mean · 9.0 median · 1.0–14.0 80%
Receptions
5.7 mean · 6.0 median · 0.0–10.0 80%
Receiving yards
69 mean · 73 median · 0–122 80%
Receiving TD
31% 1+
High

Isaac TeSlaa · DET · WR

Targets
4.5 mean · 3.0 median · 3.0–9.0 80%
Receptions
2.7 mean · 2.0 median · 1.0–5.0 80%
Receiving yards
36 mean · 27 median · 13–67 80%
Receiving TD
30% 1+
Medium

Jameson Williams · DET · WR

Targets
6.5 mean · 7.0 median · 2.0–10.0 80%
Receptions
4.3 mean · 4.0 median · 1.0–7.0 80%
Receiving yards
68 mean · 64 median · 16–112 80%
Receiving TD
32% 1+
High

Noah Fant · NO · TE

Targets
3.1 mean · 3.0 median · 1.0–6.0 80%
Receptions
2.5 mean · 2.0 median · 1.0–5.0 80%
Receiving yards
22 mean · 18 median · 9–46 80%
Receiving TD
14% 1+
High

Juwan Johnson · NO · TE

Targets
4.3 mean · 3.0 median · 1.0–8.0 80%
Receptions
3.4 mean · 3.0 median · 1.0–6.0 80%
Receiving yards
41 mean · 37 median · 12–73 80%
Receiving TD
19% 1+
High

Barion Brown · NO · WR

Targets
4.8 mean · 4.0 median · 1.0–9.0 80%
Receptions
3.0 mean · 2.0 median · 1.0–6.0 80%
Receiving yards
38 mean · 25 median · 13–76 80%
Receiving TD
20% 1+
Insufficient Evidence

Chris Olave · NO · WR

Targets
7.7 mean · 8.0 median · 3.0–12.0 80%
Receptions
5.0 mean · 5.0 median · 2.0–9.0 80%
Receiving yards
66 mean · 66 median · 26–118 80%
Receiving TD
36% 1+
High

Devaughn Vele · NO · WR

Targets
6.1 mean · 6.0 median · 4.0–10.0 80%
Receptions
4.1 mean · 4.0 median · 2.0–7.0 80%
Receiving yards
49 mean · 48 median · 24–84 80%
Receiving TD
31% 1+
Medium

15 individualized projections · 1 baseline projection. Projected role and prior usage remain separate.

Players ruled out or suppressed by current injury and availability evidence are not projected. Player ranges are not produced by, and do not sum to, the PA-1 team scores.

Model comparison

PardonMe Unified

Best historical score model

NO 19.4 — DET 23.6

DET · 60.3% win probability

Margin
DET 4.2
Total
43.1

As of Sep 12, 2026 20:59 UTC

Full Football

Personnel-aware football model

NO 24.6 — DET 25.9

DET · 53.3% win probability

Margin
DET 1.3
Total
50.5

Confidence: low · Support: 62%

As of Sep 13, 2026 16:40 UTC

P5 V4 baseline

Previous production baseline

NO 22.2 — DET 21.5

NO · 56.8% win probability

Margin
NO 0.7
Total
43.6

As of Sep 11, 2026 12:00 UTC

Full Football personnel & matchup context

These are descriptive football comparisons, not causal explanations or guaranteed effects.

NO

Expected from current depth; final active status not yet confirmed.

P9I mapped coverage of reported units: 84%. Missing talent remains unknown.

Expected-unit talent unavailable: defensive front. Depth or mapped talent support is incomplete.

QB talent: -0.12 standardized talent

Pass protection: +0.25 standardized talent

Secondary: +0.37 standardized talent

Kicking: 10/12 field goals in 8 prior games

Punting: 50.3 gross yards per punt · 12 inside the 20

Kick returns: specialist history unavailable

Punt returns: specialist history unavailable

DET

Expected from current depth; final active status not yet confirmed.

P9I mapped coverage of reported units: 93%. Missing talent remains unknown.

Expected-unit talent unavailable: defensive front. Depth or mapped talent support is incomplete.

QB talent: +0.37 standardized talent

Pass protection: +0.51 standardized talent

Secondary: +0.10 standardized talent

Kicking: 15/18 field goals in 8 prior games

Punting: 45.8 gross yards per punt · 12 inside the 20

Kick returns: 27.9 yards per return · 26 returns

Punt returns: specialist history unavailable

Pass efficiency
-0.787
Rush efficiency
+0.034
Sack environment
+0.004
Explosive passing
+0.018
Explosive rushing
-0.002
Turnover rate
+0.004

Contrasts are home offense/opponent-allowed level minus away level. Lower sack/turnover rates and starting distance have different meanings from higher efficiency.

Weather context — descriptive, not a trained model input.

Current personnel

Expected lineup & depth

Expected order for this game, using official depth and supported availability.

NOWeek 1 expected order

No supported expected lineup snapshot is available for this game.

DETWeek 1 expected order

No supported expected lineup snapshot is available for this game.

PardonMe is still being built. Projections are independent of sportsbook lines, and missing information remains visible.

Overview

Game comparisonNODET
Projected points19.423.6
Win probability39.7%60.3%
Depth chartNot confirmed yetNot confirmed yet
Current status57 updates24 updates

Matchup context

Current expectation and observed workload are distinct

Official current depth is available for 2 of 2 clubs; 118 current-depth players have prior observed F2 role evidence and 34 were at least 50% offense/defense snap players in their latest supported observation. None is treated as a current snap-confirmed starter.

NO recent scoring form vs DET prevention

2025 final-three scoring average 26.7; opponent allowed 22.7.

DET recent scoring form vs NO prevention

2025 final-three scoring average 17.7; opponent allowed 17.0.