PardonMe Unified

CHI at CAR

Sunday, September 13 · 12:00 PM CDT

CHI 22.5 — CAR 20.0

CHI slight edge · CHI 56.3%

Projected total 42.6 · Confidence: low

PardonMe projects CHI slight edge.
Player stat models

Player projections

Existing QB, RB, WR and TE statistical models. Each line shows mean · median · 80% range.

Quarterback ranges

Bryce Young · CAR

Attempts
26.6 mean · 25.0 median · 17.0–40.0 80%
Completions
17.3 mean · 17.0 median · 11.0–25.0 80%
Passing yards
188 mean · 167 median · 103–301 80%
Passing TD
1.26 mean · 69% 1+
Interceptions
0.58 mean · 44% 1+
Medium uncertainty

Caleb Williams · CHI

Attempts
32.1 mean · 33.0 median · 24.0–41.0 80%
Completions
19.7 mean · 20.0 median · 14.0–26.0 80%
Passing yards
219 mean · 217 median · 150–322 80%
Passing TD
1.55 mean · 78% 1+
Interceptions
0.66 mean · 48% 1+
Medium uncertainty

Running back ranges

Jonathon Brooks · CAR

Opportunities
13.3 mean · 11.0 median · 6.0–23.0 80%
Carries
10.4 mean · 9.0 median · 5.0–18.0 80%
Targets
2.9 mean · 2.0 median · 1.0–6.0 80%
Rushing yards
43 mean · 36 median · 18–76 80%
Receptions
2.3 mean · 2.0 median · 0.0–5.0 80%
Receiving yards
17 mean · 15 median · 0–37 80%
Total TD
32% 1+
Insufficient Evidence

Chuba Hubbard · CAR

Opportunities
11.9 mean · 9.0 median · 7.0–20.0 80%
Carries
9.5 mean · 8.0 median · 5.0–16.0 80%
Targets
2.4 mean · 2.0 median · 0.0–5.0 80%
Rushing yards
38 mean · 32 median · 17–68 80%
Receptions
1.9 mean · 2.0 median · 0.0–4.0 80%
Receiving yards
14 mean · 12 median · 0–30 80%
Total TD
29% 1+
High

Kyle Monangai · CHI

Opportunities
11.3 mean · 10.0 median · 4.0–20.0 80%
Carries
9.6 mean · 9.0 median · 3.0–18.0 80%
Targets
1.7 mean · 1.0 median · 0.0–4.0 80%
Rushing yards
42 mean · 37 median · 14–81 80%
Receptions
1.2 mean · 1.0 median · 0.0–3.0 80%
Receiving yards
10 mean · 8 median · 0–23 80%
Total TD
28% 1+
Medium

D'Andre Swift · CHI

Opportunities
15.8 mean · 17.0 median · 9.0–22.0 80%
Carries
13.3 mean · 13.0 median · 7.0–19.0 80%
Targets
2.6 mean · 2.0 median · 1.0–5.0 80%
Rushing yards
65 mean · 63 median · 33–97 80%
Receptions
1.9 mean · 2.0 median · 0.0–4.0 80%
Receiving yards
16 mean · 15 median · 0–34 80%
Total TD
41% 1+
High

Receiver and tight end ranges

Mitchell Evans · CAR · TE

Targets
3.2 mean · 3.0 median · 2.0–5.0 80%
Receptions
2.4 mean · 2.0 median · 1.0–4.0 80%
Receiving yards
22 mean · 19 median · 9–38 80%
Receiving TD
16% 1+
Medium

Tommy Tremble · CAR · TE

Targets
2.8 mean · 2.0 median · 1.0–6.0 80%
Receptions
1.9 mean · 1.0 median · 0.0–4.0 80%
Receiving yards
19 mean · 10 median · 0–41 80%
Receiving TD
13% 1+
High

Jalen Coker · CAR · WR

Targets
5.3 mean · 5.0 median · 3.0–8.0 80%
Receptions
3.9 mean · 4.0 median · 2.0–6.0 80%
Receiving yards
45 mean · 47 median · 23–70 80%
Receiving TD
25% 1+
Medium

Xavier Legette · CAR · WR

Targets
4.0 mean · 3.0 median · 1.0–8.0 80%
Receptions
2.5 mean · 2.0 median · 0.0–6.0 80%
Receiving yards
29 mean · 23 median · 0–69 80%
Receiving TD
17% 1+
Medium

Tetairoa McMillan · CAR · WR

Targets
6.3 mean · 6.0 median · 2.0–10.0 80%
Receptions
3.7 mean · 3.0 median · 1.0–7.0 80%
Receiving yards
53 mean · 42 median · 14–99 80%
Receiving TD
35% 1+
Medium

Cole Kmet · CHI · TE

Targets
3.8 mean · 4.0 median · 2.0–6.0 80%
Receptions
2.7 mean · 3.0 median · 1.0–4.0 80%
Receiving yards
27 mean · 30 median · 10–40 80%
Receiving TD
17% 1+
High

Colston Loveland · CHI · TE

Targets
5.7 mean · 5.0 median · 4.0–10.0 80%
Receptions
4.1 mean · 4.0 median · 2.0–7.0 80%
Receiving yards
50 mean · 48 median · 24–85 80%
Receiving TD
28% 1+
Medium

Luther Burden III · CHI · WR

Targets
6.5 mean · 6.0 median · 4.0–10.0 80%
Receptions
4.8 mean · 5.0 median · 2.0–8.0 80%
Receiving yards
62 mean · 65 median · 26–104 80%
Receiving TD
23% 1+
Medium

Rome Odunze · CHI · WR

Targets
7.1 mean · 7.0 median · 3.0–10.0 80%
Receptions
3.7 mean · 4.0 median · 1.0–6.0 80%
Receiving yards
54 mean · 58 median · 15–87 80%
Receiving TD
33% 1+
Medium

Jahdae Walker · CHI · WR

Targets
3.9 mean · 3.0 median · 2.0–7.0 80%
Receptions
2.5 mean · 2.0 median · 1.0–4.0 80%
Receiving yards
33 mean · 27 median · 13–53 80%
Receiving TD
22% 1+
Insufficient Evidence

15 individualized projections · 1 baseline projection. Projected role and prior usage remain separate.

Players ruled out or suppressed by current injury and availability evidence are not projected. Player ranges are not produced by, and do not sum to, the PA-1 team scores.

Model comparison

PardonMe Unified

Best historical score model

CHI 22.5 — CAR 20.0

CHI · 56.3% win probability

Margin
CHI 2.5
Total
42.6

As of Sep 12, 2026 20:59 UTC

Full Football

Personnel-aware football model

CHI 19.8 — CAR 19.3

CHI · 51.2% win probability

Margin
CHI 0.5
Total
39.2

Confidence: low · Support: 68%

As of Sep 13, 2026 16:41 UTC

P5 V4 baseline

Previous production baseline

CHI 22.1 — CAR 21.4

CHI · 56.0% win probability

Margin
CHI 0.7
Total
43.5

As of Sep 11, 2026 12:00 UTC

Full Football personnel & matchup context

These are descriptive football comparisons, not causal explanations or guaranteed effects.

CHI

Expected from current depth; final active status not yet confirmed.

P9I mapped coverage of reported units: 94%. Missing talent remains unknown.

Expected-unit talent unavailable: defensive front. Depth or mapped talent support is incomplete.

QB talent: +0.54 standardized talent

Pass protection: +0.81 standardized talent

Secondary: +0.59 standardized talent

Kicking: 14/16 field goals in 8 prior games

Punting: 47.5 gross yards per punt · 12 inside the 20

Kick returns: 20.8 yards per return · 9 returns

Punt returns: 4.6 yards per return · 25 returns

CAR

Expected from current depth; final active status not yet confirmed.

P9I mapped coverage of reported units: 86%. Missing talent remains unknown.

QB talent: +0.46 standardized talent

Pass protection: +0.64 standardized talent

Pass rush: +0.88 standardized talent

Secondary: +0.42 standardized talent

Kicking: 10/13 field goals in 8 prior games

Punting: 46.7 gross yards per punt · 15 inside the 20

Kick returns: specialist history unavailable

Punt returns: 0.0 yards per return · 1 returns

Pass efficiency
-0.198
Rush efficiency
-0.134
Sack environment
+0.005
Explosive passing
+0.013
Explosive rushing
+0.001
Turnover rate
+0.010

Contrasts are home offense/opponent-allowed level minus away level. Lower sack/turnover rates and starting distance have different meanings from higher efficiency.

Weather context — descriptive, not a trained model input.

Current personnel

Expected lineup & depth

Expected order for this game, using official depth and supported availability.

CHIWeek 1 expected order

No supported expected lineup snapshot is available for this game.

CARWeek 1 expected order

No supported expected lineup snapshot is available for this game.

PardonMe is still being built. Projections are independent of sportsbook lines, and missing information remains visible.

Overview

Game comparisonCHICAR
Projected points22.520.0
Win probability56.3%43.7%
Depth chartNot confirmed yetNot confirmed yet
Current status77 updates61 updates

Matchup context

Current expectation and observed workload are distinct

Official current depth is available for 2 of 2 clubs; 126 current-depth players have prior observed F2 role evidence and 36 were at least 50% offense/defense snap players in their latest supported observation. None is treated as a current snap-confirmed starter.

CAR recent scoring form vs CHI prevention

2025 final-three scoring average 15.7; opponent allowed 25.7.

CHI recent scoring form vs CAR prevention

2025 final-three scoring average 25.3; opponent allowed 21.0.