PardonMe Unified

MIA at LV

Sunday, September 13 · 3:25 PM CDT

MIA 23.9 — LV 16.0

MIA edge · MIA 68.9%

Projected total 39.9 · Confidence: moderate

PardonMe projects MIA edge.
Player stat models

Player projections

Existing QB, RB, WR and TE statistical models. Each line shows mean · median · 80% range.

Quarterback ranges

Kirk Cousins · LV

Attempts
31.4 mean · 31.0 median · 21.0–44.0 80%
Completions
20.1 mean · 20.0 median · 13.0–27.0 80%
Passing yards
216 mean · 199 median · 126–331 80%
Passing TD
1.34 mean · 72% 1+
Interceptions
0.69 mean · 49% 1+
Medium uncertainty

Malik Willis · MIA

Attempts
25.6 mean · 24.0 median · 14.0–40.0 80%
Completions
16.8 mean · 16.0 median · 8.0–27.0 80%
Passing yards
193 mean · 191 median · 85–302 80%
Passing TD
1.00 mean · 60% 1+
Interceptions
0.57 mean · 42% 1+
Insufficient Evidence uncertainty

Running back ranges

Ashton Jeanty · LV

Opportunities
17.7 mean · 17.0 median · 6.0–26.0 80%
Carries
13.6 mean · 13.0 median · 5.0–21.0 80%
Targets
4.1 mean · 4.0 median · 1.0–8.0 80%
Rushing yards
50 mean · 48 median · 18–80 80%
Receptions
3.1 mean · 3.0 median · 1.0–6.0 80%
Receiving yards
24 mean · 20 median · 6–46 80%
Total TD
40% 1+
Medium

Mike Washington Jr. · LV

Opportunities
13.3 mean · 13.0 median · 5.0–22.0 80%
Carries
10.7 mean · 10.0 median · 4.0–19.0 80%
Targets
2.6 mean · 2.0 median · 0.0–5.0 80%
Rushing yards
46 mean · 41 median · 16–82 80%
Receptions
2.0 mean · 2.0 median · 0.0–4.0 80%
Receiving yards
15 mean · 13 median · 0–33 80%
Total TD
32% 1+
Insufficient Evidence

De'Von Achane · MIA

Opportunities
17.1 mean · 17.0 median · 6.0–24.0 80%
Carries
13.1 mean · 14.0 median · 5.0–19.0 80%
Targets
4.0 mean · 4.0 median · 1.0–7.0 80%
Rushing yards
70 mean · 68 median · 26–110 80%
Receptions
3.2 mean · 3.0 median · 1.0–6.0 80%
Receiving yards
24 mean · 22 median · 7–44 80%
Total TD
42% 1+
High

Jaylen Wright · MIA

Opportunities
10.9 mean · 9.0 median · 5.0–21.0 80%
Carries
9.4 mean · 8.0 median · 4.0–19.0 80%
Targets
1.5 mean · 1.0 median · 0.0–3.0 80%
Rushing yards
37 mean · 28 median · 12–74 80%
Receptions
1.1 mean · 1.0 median · 0.0–3.0 80%
Receiving yards
8 mean · 7 median · 0–21 80%
Total TD
26% 1+
Medium

Receiver and tight end ranges

Brock Bowers · LV · TE

Targets
5.6 mean · 5.0 median · 2.0–11.0 80%
Receptions
4.2 mean · 4.0 median · 1.0–8.0 80%
Receiving yards
44 mean · 42 median · 11–85 80%
Receiving TD
28% 1+
Medium

Michael Mayer · LV · TE

Targets
4.1 mean · 4.0 median · 1.0–7.0 80%
Receptions
2.9 mean · 2.0 median · 1.0–6.0 80%
Receiving yards
28 mean · 19 median · 10–57 80%
Receiving TD
17% 1+
High

Jack Bech · LV · WR

Targets
4.8 mean · 4.0 median · 3.0–8.0 80%
Receptions
3.1 mean · 3.0 median · 1.0–5.0 80%
Receiving yards
37 mean · 35 median · 12–58 80%
Receiving TD
17% 1+
Medium

Jalen Nailor · LV · WR

Targets
4.0 mean · 4.0 median · 2.0–7.0 80%
Receptions
2.4 mean · 2.0 median · 1.0–4.0 80%
Receiving yards
38 mean · 32 median · 16–64 80%
Receiving TD
21% 1+
High

Tre Tucker · LV · WR

Targets
6.2 mean · 6.0 median · 4.0–9.0 80%
Receptions
3.8 mean · 4.0 median · 2.0–6.0 80%
Receiving yards
42 mean · 45 median · 22–67 80%
Receiving TD
20% 1+
High

Greg Dulcich · MIA · TE

Targets
4.7 mean · 4.0 median · 2.0–7.0 80%
Receptions
3.3 mean · 3.0 median · 1.0–6.0 80%
Receiving yards
37 mean · 34 median · 11–68 80%
Receiving TD
20% 1+
Medium

Will Kacmarek · MIA · TE

Targets
3.6 mean · 3.0 median · 1.0–8.0 80%
Receptions
2.6 mean · 2.0 median · 0.0–6.0 80%
Receiving yards
26 mean · 21 median · 0–62 80%
Receiving TD
16% 1+
Insufficient Evidence

Caleb Douglas · MIA · WR

Targets
4.8 mean · 4.0 median · 1.0–10.0 80%
Receptions
3.0 mean · 2.0 median · 1.0–6.0 80%
Receiving yards
38 mean · 25 median · 13–76 80%
Receiving TD
21% 1+
Insufficient Evidence

Jalen Tolbert · MIA · WR

Targets
4.5 mean · 3.0 median · 2.0–9.0 80%
Receptions
2.6 mean · 2.0 median · 1.0–5.0 80%
Receiving yards
35 mean · 27 median · 13–67 80%
Receiving TD
17% 1+
High

Malik Washington · MIA · WR

Targets
3.9 mean · 4.0 median · 1.0–7.0 80%
Receptions
2.8 mean · 3.0 median · 1.0–5.0 80%
Receiving yards
25 mean · 27 median · 9–45 80%
Receiving TD
20% 1+
Medium

13 individualized projections · 3 baseline projections. Projected role and prior usage remain separate.

Players ruled out or suppressed by current injury and availability evidence are not projected. Player ranges are not produced by, and do not sum to, the PA-1 team scores.

Model comparison

PardonMe Unified

Best historical score model

MIA 23.9 — LV 16.0

MIA · 68.9% win probability

Margin
MIA 7.9
Total
39.9

As of Sep 12, 2026 20:59 UTC

Full Football

Personnel-aware football model

MIA 18.8 — LV 16.1

MIA · 56.6% win probability

Margin
MIA 2.7
Total
34.9

Confidence: low · Support: 70%

As of Sep 13, 2026 20:05 UTC

P5 V4 baseline

Previous production baseline

MIA 19.5 — LV 21.9

LV · 53.1% win probability

Margin
LV 2.4
Total
41.4

As of Sep 11, 2026 12:00 UTC

Full Football personnel & matchup context

These are descriptive football comparisons, not causal explanations or guaranteed effects.

MIA

Expected from current depth; final active status not yet confirmed.

P9I mapped coverage of reported units: 78%. Missing talent remains unknown.

QB talent: +0.05 standardized talent

Pass protection: -0.24 standardized talent

Pass rush: +0.34 standardized talent

Secondary: -0.62 standardized talent

Kicking: 14/14 field goals in 8 prior games

Punting: 45.7 gross yards per punt · 23 inside the 20

Kick returns: 27.2 yards per return · 17 returns

Punt returns: 4.3 yards per return · 16 returns

LV

Expected from current depth; final active status not yet confirmed.

P9I mapped coverage of reported units: 98%. Missing talent remains unknown.

QB talent: -0.92 standardized talent

Pass protection: +0.30 standardized talent

Pass rush: +0.83 standardized talent

Secondary: +0.68 standardized talent

Kicking: 10/13 field goals in 8 prior games

Punting: 47.6 gross yards per punt · 12 inside the 20

Kick returns: 24.7 yards per return · 18 returns

Punt returns: specialist history unavailable

Pass efficiency
-0.853
Rush efficiency
-0.653
Sack environment
+0.022
Drive scoring
-0.417
Red-zone TD rate
+0.036
Explosive passing
-0.017
Explosive rushing
-0.047
Starting distance to goal
+1.845
Turnover rate
+0.005

Contrasts are home offense/opponent-allowed level minus away level. Lower sack/turnover rates and starting distance have different meanings from higher efficiency.

Weather context — descriptive, not a trained model input.

Current personnel

Expected lineup & depth

Expected order for this game, using official depth and supported availability.

MIAWeek 1 expected order

No supported expected lineup snapshot is available for this game.

LVWeek 1 expected order

No supported expected lineup snapshot is available for this game.

PardonMe is still being built. Projections are independent of sportsbook lines, and missing information remains visible.

Overview

Game comparisonMIALV
Projected points23.916.0
Win probability68.9%31.1%
Depth chartNot confirmed yetNot confirmed yet
Current status35 updates76 updates

Matchup context

Current expectation and observed workload are distinct

Official current depth is available for 2 of 2 clubs; 101 current-depth players have prior observed F2 role evidence and 32 were at least 50% offense/defense snap players in their latest supported observation. None is treated as a current snap-confirmed starter.

LV recent scoring form vs MIA prevention

2025 final-three scoring average 15.0; opponent allowed 33.3.

MIA recent scoring form vs LV prevention

2025 final-three scoring average 17.0; opponent allowed 23.0.