P5 V4 baseline

MIN at CHI

Sunday, September 20 · 12:00 PM CDT

MIN 21.9 — CHI 26.1

CHI edge · CHI 58.7%

Projected total 48.0 · Confidence: limited evidence

PardonMe projects CHI edge.
Why PardonMe leans CHI →

Current expectation and observed workload are distinct: Official current depth is available for 2 of 2 clubs; 117 current-depth players have prior observed F2 role evidence and 38 were at least 50% offense/defense snap players in their latest supported observation. None is treated as a current snap-confirmed starter.

Player stat models

Player projections

Existing QB, RB, WR and TE statistical models. Each line shows mean · median · 80% range.

Quarterback ranges

Caleb Williams · CHI

Attempts
31.1 mean · 32.0 median · 23.0–40.0 80%
Completions
19.8 mean · 20.0 median · 14.0–26.0 80%
Passing yards
213 mean · 211 median · 145–314 80%
Passing TD
1.49 mean · 76% 1+
Interceptions
0.65 mean · 48% 1+
Medium uncertainty

Kyler Murray · MIN

Attempts
31.1 mean · 30.0 median · 22.0–42.0 80%
Completions
19.5 mean · 19.0 median · 13.0–27.0 80%
Passing yards
203 mean · 197 median · 145–303 80%
Passing TD
1.38 mean · 73% 1+
Interceptions
0.67 mean · 48% 1+
Medium uncertainty

Running back ranges

Kyle Monangai · CHI

Opportunities
9.5 mean · 8.0 median · 2.0–19.0 80%
Carries
8.0 mean · 7.0 median · 2.0–17.0 80%
Targets
1.5 mean · 1.0 median · 0.0–4.0 80%
Rushing yards
38 mean · 33 median · 10–77 80%
Receptions
1.1 mean · 1.0 median · 0.0–3.0 80%
Receiving yards
9 mean · 8 median · 0–23 80%
Total TD
26% 1+
Medium

D'Andre Swift · CHI

Opportunities
10.4 mean · 11.0 median · 3.0–16.0 80%
Carries
8.7 mean · 9.0 median · 3.0–14.0 80%
Targets
1.7 mean · 1.0 median · 0.0–4.0 80%
Rushing yards
41 mean · 40 median · 12–69 80%
Receptions
1.2 mean · 1.0 median · 0.0–3.0 80%
Receiving yards
10 mean · 8 median · 0–25 80%
Total TD
28% 1+
High

Aaron Jones Sr. · MIN

Opportunities
12.7 mean · 12.0 median · 5.0–21.0 80%
Carries
9.9 mean · 9.0 median · 4.0–17.0 80%
Targets
2.8 mean · 2.0 median · 1.0–6.0 80%
Rushing yards
37 mean · 33 median · 12–68 80%
Receptions
1.9 mean · 2.0 median · 0.0–4.0 80%
Receiving yards
14 mean · 13 median · 0–30 80%
Total TD
27% 1+
High

Jordan Mason · MIN

Opportunities
11.3 mean · 10.0 median · 5.0–19.0 80%
Carries
10.1 mean · 9.0 median · 5.0–17.0 80%
Targets
1.2 mean · 1.0 median · 0.0–3.0 80%
Rushing yards
46 mean · 41 median · 19–80 80%
Receptions
1.0 mean · 1.0 median · 0.0–3.0 80%
Receiving yards
7 mean · 6 median · 0–18 80%
Total TD
30% 1+
High

Receiver and tight end ranges

Cole Kmet · CHI · TE

Targets
4.3 mean · 4.0 median · 3.0–6.0 80%
Receptions
2.7 mean · 3.0 median · 1.0–4.0 80%
Receiving yards
27 mean · 29 median · 9–40 80%
Receiving TD
18% 1+
High

Colston Loveland · CHI · TE

Targets
4.2 mean · 3.0 median · 2.0–9.0 80%
Receptions
3.0 mean · 3.0 median · 1.0–6.0 80%
Receiving yards
39 mean · 32 median · 19–80 80%
Receiving TD
19% 1+
Medium

Luther Burden III · CHI · WR

Targets
5.5 mean · 5.0 median · 2.0–9.0 80%
Receptions
4.1 mean · 4.0 median · 2.0–7.0 80%
Receiving yards
54 mean · 53 median · 27–92 80%
Receiving TD
20% 1+
Medium

Rome Odunze · CHI · WR

Targets
5.3 mean · 5.0 median · 1.0–9.0 80%
Receptions
2.8 mean · 3.0 median · 0.0–5.0 80%
Receiving yards
41 mean · 45 median · 0–75 80%
Receiving TD
26% 1+
Medium

Jahdae Walker · CHI · WR

Targets
4.3 mean · 4.0 median · 2.9–7.0 80%
Receptions
2.8 mean · 3.0 median · 1.0–5.0 80%
Receiving yards
38 mean · 38 median · 11–65 80%
Receiving TD
26% 1+
Insufficient Evidence

T.J. Hockenson · MIN · TE

Targets
3.5 mean · 3.0 median · 1.0–6.0 80%
Receptions
2.6 mean · 2.0 median · 0.0–5.0 80%
Receiving yards
23 mean · 19 median · 0–46 80%
Receiving TD
15% 1+
High

Josh Oliver · MIN · TE

Targets
2.6 mean · 2.0 median · 1.0–4.0 80%
Receptions
2.1 mean · 2.0 median · 1.0–4.0 80%
Receiving yards
23 mean · 21 median · 10–42 80%
Receiving TD
17% 1+
High

Jordan Addison · MIN · WR

Targets
5.8 mean · 5.0 median · 2.0–12.0 80%
Receptions
2.7 mean · 2.0 median · 0.0–6.0 80%
Receiving yards
38 mean · 26 median · 0–80 80%
Receiving TD
19% 1+
High

Justin Jefferson · MIN · WR

Targets
4.8 mean · 5.0 median · 1.0–8.0 80%
Receptions
3.3 mean · 3.0 median · 1.0–6.0 80%
Receiving yards
38 mean · 40 median · 7–64 80%
Receiving TD
15% 1+
High

Jauan Jennings · MIN · WR

Targets
5.1 mean · 5.0 median · 2.0–7.0 80%
Receptions
3.0 mean · 3.0 median · 1.0–5.0 80%
Receiving yards
35 mean · 34 median · 11–58 80%
Receiving TD
30% 1+
High

16 individualized projections. Projected role and prior usage remain separate.

Players ruled out or suppressed by current injury and availability evidence are not projected. Player ranges are not produced by, and do not sum to, the PA-1 team scores.

Model comparison

PardonMe Unified

Best historical score model

Unified unavailable — P5 baseline shown.

Full Football

Personnel-aware football model

Full Football unavailable.

P5 V4 baseline

Previous production baseline

MIN 21.9 — CHI 26.1

CHI · 58.7% win probability

Margin
CHI 4.2
Total
48.0

As of Sep 17, 2026 23:48 UTC

Current personnel

Expected lineup & depth

Expected order for this game, using official depth and supported availability.

MINWeek 2 expected order

No supported expected lineup snapshot is available for this game.

CHIWeek 2 expected order

No supported expected lineup snapshot is available for this game.

PardonMe is still being built. Projections are independent of sportsbook lines, and missing information remains visible.

Overview

Game comparisonMINCHI
Projected points21.926.1
Win probability41.3%58.7%
Depth chartNot confirmed yetNot confirmed yet
Current status66 updates77 updates

Matchup context

Current expectation and observed workload are distinct

Official current depth is available for 2 of 2 clubs; 117 current-depth players have prior observed F2 role evidence and 38 were at least 50% offense/defense snap players in their latest supported observation. None is treated as a current snap-confirmed starter.

CHI recent scoring form vs MIN prevention

2025 final-three scoring average 37.7; opponent allowed 11.7.

MIN recent scoring form vs CHI prevention

2025 final-three scoring average 26.0; opponent allowed 32.7.