P5 V4 baseline

PHI at TEN

Sunday, September 20 · 12:00 PM CDT

PHI 21.4 — TEN 19.8

PHI slight edge · PHI 58.1%

Projected total 41.2 · Confidence: limited evidence

PardonMe projects PHI slight edge.
Why PardonMe leans PHI →

Current expectation and observed workload are distinct: Official current depth is available for 2 of 2 clubs; 126 current-depth players have prior observed F2 role evidence and 41 were at least 50% offense/defense snap players in their latest supported observation. None is treated as a current snap-confirmed starter.

Player stat models

Player projections

Existing QB, RB, WR and TE statistical models. Each line shows mean · median · 80% range.

Quarterback ranges

Jalen Hurts · PHI

Attempts
32.8 mean · 32.0 median · 23.0–42.0 80%
Completions
21.4 mean · 21.0 median · 14.0–29.0 80%
Passing yards
226 mean · 217 median · 134–308 80%
Passing TD
1.43 mean · 74% 1+
Interceptions
0.73 mean · 51% 1+
Medium uncertainty

Cam Ward · TEN

Attempts
33.2 mean · 32.0 median · 22.0–43.0 80%
Completions
21.5 mean · 21.0 median · 14.0–29.0 80%
Passing yards
213 mean · 207 median · 129–296 80%
Passing TD
1.40 mean · 74% 1+
Interceptions
0.67 mean · 49% 1+
Medium uncertainty

Running back ranges

Saquon Barkley · PHI

Opportunities
14.6 mean · 15.0 median · 5.0–22.0 80%
Carries
12.5 mean · 13.0 median · 5.0–19.0 80%
Targets
2.2 mean · 2.0 median · 0.0–4.0 80%
Rushing yards
47 mean · 46 median · 11–80 80%
Receptions
1.4 mean · 1.0 median · 0.0–3.0 80%
Receiving yards
11 mean · 8 median · 0–23 80%
Total TD
30% 1+
High

Tony Pollard · TEN

Opportunities
15.0 mean · 14.0 median · 11.0–21.0 80%
Carries
12.8 mean · 12.0 median · 8.0–19.0 80%
Targets
2.2 mean · 2.0 median · 0.0–4.0 80%
Rushing yards
50 mean · 46 median · 26–79 80%
Receptions
1.7 mean · 2.0 median · 0.0–4.0 80%
Receiving yards
12 mean · 11 median · 0–26 80%
Total TD
31% 1+
High

Tyjae Spears · TEN

Opportunities
11.8 mean · 10.0 median · 8.0–19.0 80%
Carries
7.0 mean · 6.0 median · 3.0–12.0 80%
Targets
4.8 mean · 4.0 median · 2.0–8.0 80%
Rushing yards
34 mean · 30 median · 15–60 80%
Receptions
3.9 mean · 4.0 median · 1.0–7.0 80%
Receiving yards
26 mean · 24 median · 8–47 80%
Total TD
29% 1+
High

Receiver and tight end ranges

Dallas Goedert · PHI · TE

Targets
3.8 mean · 3.0 median · 1.0–8.0 80%
Receptions
2.5 mean · 2.0 median · 0.0–6.0 80%
Receiving yards
26 mean · 22 median · 0–62 80%
Receiving TD
19% 1+
High

Johnny Mundt · PHI · TE

Targets
2.4 mean · 2.0 median · 1.0–4.0 80%
Receptions
1.5 mean · 1.0 median · 0.0–3.0 80%
Receiving yards
17 mean · 20 median · 0–32 80%
Receiving TD
13% 1+
High

Darius Cooper · PHI · WR

Targets
3.7 mean · 3.0 median · 1.0–6.0 80%
Receptions
2.1 mean · 2.0 median · 0.0–5.0 80%
Receiving yards
23 mean · 21 median · 0–54 80%
Receiving TD
13% 1+
Insufficient Evidence

DeVonta Smith · PHI · WR

Targets
4.4 mean · 5.0 median · 0.0–9.0 80%
Receptions
3.4 mean · 3.0 median · 0.0–6.0 80%
Receiving yards
49 mean · 43 median · 0–85 80%
Receiving TD
22% 1+
High

Dontayvion Wicks · PHI · WR

Targets
3.6 mean · 3.0 median · 1.0–7.0 80%
Receptions
2.8 mean · 2.0 median · 1.0–6.0 80%
Receiving yards
34 mean · 33 median · 10–67 80%
Receiving TD
19% 1+
High

Daniel Bellinger · TEN · TE

Targets
3.9 mean · 3.0 median · 2.0–6.0 80%
Receptions
2.3 mean · 2.0 median · 1.0–4.0 80%
Receiving yards
32 mean · 27 median · 12–54 80%
Receiving TD
17% 1+
High

Gunnar Helm · TEN · TE

Targets
3.7 mean · 3.0 median · 1.0–7.0 80%
Receptions
2.9 mean · 3.0 median · 1.0–5.0 80%
Receiving yards
24 mean · 24 median · 7–41 80%
Receiving TD
18% 1+
Medium

Calvin Ridley · TEN · WR

Targets
3.6 mean · 3.0 median · 0.0–8.0 80%
Receptions
2.4 mean · 2.0 median · 0.0–5.0 80%
Receiving yards
40 mean · 31 median · 0–94 80%
Receiving TD
14% 1+
High

Wan'Dale Robinson · TEN · WR

Targets
5.8 mean · 6.0 median · 1.0–11.0 80%
Receptions
4.3 mean · 4.0 median · 1.0–8.0 80%
Receiving yards
49 mean · 53 median · 10–85 80%
Receiving TD
24% 1+
High

Carnell Tate · TEN · WR

Targets
5.1 mean · 6.0 median · 1.0–8.0 80%
Receptions
3.3 mean · 3.0 median · 1.0–6.0 80%
Receiving yards
39 mean · 35 median · 12–70 80%
Receiving TD
21% 1+
Insufficient Evidence

15 individualized projections. Projected role and prior usage remain separate.

Players ruled out or suppressed by current injury and availability evidence are not projected. Player ranges are not produced by, and do not sum to, the PA-1 team scores.

Model comparison

PardonMe Unified

Best historical score model

Unified unavailable — P5 baseline shown.

Full Football

Personnel-aware football model

Full Football unavailable.

P5 V4 baseline

Previous production baseline

PHI 21.4 — TEN 19.8

PHI · 58.1% win probability

Margin
PHI 1.6
Total
41.2

As of Sep 17, 2026 23:48 UTC

Current personnel

Expected lineup & depth

Expected order for this game, using official depth and supported availability.

PHIWeek 2 expected order

No supported expected lineup snapshot is available for this game.

TENWeek 2 expected order

No supported expected lineup snapshot is available for this game.

PardonMe is still being built. Projections are independent of sportsbook lines, and missing information remains visible.

Overview

Game comparisonPHITEN
Projected points21.419.8
Win probability58.1%41.9%
Depth chartNot confirmed yetNot confirmed yet
Current status70 updates43 updates

Matchup context

Current expectation and observed workload are distinct

Official current depth is available for 2 of 2 clubs; 126 current-depth players have prior observed F2 role evidence and 41 were at least 50% offense/defense snap players in their latest supported observation. None is treated as a current snap-confirmed starter.

PHI recent scoring form vs TEN prevention

2025 final-three scoring average 18.0; opponent allowed 32.7.

TEN recent scoring form vs PHI prevention

2025 final-three scoring average 14.3; opponent allowed 19.3.