P5 V4 baseline

PIT at NE

Sunday, September 20 · 12:00 PM CDT

PIT 18.3 — NE 26.1

NE edge · NE 68.0%

Projected total 44.4 · Confidence: limited evidence

PardonMe projects NE edge.
Why PardonMe leans NE →

Current expectation and observed workload are distinct: Official current depth is available for 2 of 2 clubs; 113 current-depth players have prior observed F2 role evidence and 31 were at least 50% offense/defense snap players in their latest supported observation. None is treated as a current snap-confirmed starter.

Player stat models

Player projections

Existing QB, RB, WR and TE statistical models. Each line shows mean · median · 80% range.

Quarterback ranges

Drake Maye · NE

Attempts
31.6 mean · 32.0 median · 21.0–45.0 80%
Completions
21.4 mean · 21.0 median · 14.0–29.0 80%
Passing yards
255 mean · 270 median · 164–345 80%
Passing TD
1.64 mean · 79% 1+
Interceptions
0.68 mean · 49% 1+
Medium uncertainty

Aaron Rodgers · PIT

Attempts
33.2 mean · 34.0 median · 21.0–44.0 80%
Completions
21.9 mean · 22.0 median · 14.0–30.0 80%
Passing yards
223 mean · 226 median · 125–297 80%
Passing TD
1.15 mean · 67% 1+
Interceptions
0.67 mean · 48% 1+
Medium uncertainty

Running back ranges

TreVeyon Henderson · NE

Opportunities
13.5 mean · 13.0 median · 5.0–21.0 80%
Carries
11.4 mean · 11.0 median · 5.0–18.0 80%
Targets
2.1 mean · 2.0 median · 0.0–4.0 80%
Rushing yards
56 mean · 52 median · 22–96 80%
Receptions
1.7 mean · 1.0 median · 0.0–4.0 80%
Receiving yards
13 mean · 12 median · 0–28 80%
Total TD
38% 1+
Medium

Rhamondre Stevenson · NE

Opportunities
10.6 mean · 9.0 median · 6.0–18.0 80%
Carries
8.1 mean · 7.0 median · 4.0–14.0 80%
Targets
2.5 mean · 2.0 median · 0.0–5.0 80%
Rushing yards
43 mean · 36 median · 18–75 80%
Receptions
1.9 mean · 2.0 median · 0.0–4.0 80%
Receiving yards
15 mean · 13 median · 0–31 80%
Total TD
34% 1+
High

Eli Heidenreich · PIT

Opportunities
12.3 mean · 12.0 median · 4.0–22.0 80%
Carries
9.9 mean · 9.0 median · 3.0–18.0 80%
Targets
2.4 mean · 2.0 median · 0.0–5.0 80%
Rushing yards
42 mean · 38 median · 13–79 80%
Receptions
1.9 mean · 2.0 median · 0.0–4.0 80%
Receiving yards
14 mean · 11 median · 0–31 80%
Total TD
31% 1+
Insufficient Evidence

Jaylen Warren · PIT

Opportunities
12.3 mean · 12.0 median · 7.0–17.0 80%
Carries
10.5 mean · 11.0 median · 6.0–15.0 80%
Targets
1.7 mean · 1.0 median · 0.0–4.0 80%
Rushing yards
47 mean · 45 median · 23–75 80%
Receptions
1.5 mean · 1.0 median · 0.0–3.0 80%
Receiving yards
12 mean · 10 median · 0–26 80%
Total TD
33% 1+
High

Receiver and tight end ranges

Hunter Henry · NE · TE

Targets
3.6 mean · 4.0 median · 0.0–6.0 80%
Receptions
2.7 mean · 3.0 median · 0.0–5.0 80%
Receiving yards
34 mean · 26 median · 0–62 80%
Receiving TD
19% 1+
High

Eli Raridon · NE · TE

Targets
3.7 mean · 2.0 median · 2.0–7.0 80%
Receptions
2.7 mean · 2.0 median · 1.0–6.0 80%
Receiving yards
26 mean · 19 median · 10–57 80%
Receiving TD
19% 1+
Insufficient Evidence

Romeo Doubs · NE · WR

Targets
5.1 mean · 4.0 median · 2.0–9.0 80%
Receptions
3.4 mean · 3.0 median · 1.0–6.0 80%
Receiving yards
45 mean · 40 median · 14–78 80%
Receiving TD
21% 1+
High

DeMario Douglas · NE · WR

Targets
4.3 mean · 4.0 median · 2.0–7.0 80%
Receptions
3.5 mean · 3.0 median · 2.0–5.0 80%
Receiving yards
56 mean · 47 median · 30–92 80%
Receiving TD
23% 1+
High

Mack Hollins · NE · WR

Targets
4.9 mean · 4.0 median · 1.0–9.0 80%
Receptions
3.6 mean · 3.0 median · 1.0–7.0 80%
Receiving yards
46 mean · 40 median · 15–89 80%
Receiving TD
18% 1+
High

Pat Freiermuth · PIT · TE

Targets
3.7 mean · 4.0 median · 1.0–6.0 80%
Receptions
2.8 mean · 3.0 median · 1.0–5.0 80%
Receiving yards
33 mean · 36 median · 12–60 80%
Receiving TD
19% 1+
High

Darnell Washington · PIT · TE

Targets
2.5 mean · 3.0 median · 0.0–5.0 80%
Receptions
2.1 mean · 2.0 median · 0.0–4.0 80%
Receiving yards
27 mean · 22 median · 0–56 80%
Receiving TD
15% 1+
High

DK Metcalf · PIT · WR

Targets
5.9 mean · 6.0 median · 2.0–9.0 80%
Receptions
3.5 mean · 3.0 median · 1.0–6.0 80%
Receiving yards
49 mean · 45 median · 16–88 80%
Receiving TD
25% 1+
High

Michael Pittman Jr. · PIT · WR

Targets
5.5 mean · 4.0 median · 2.0–11.0 80%
Receptions
3.4 mean · 3.0 median · 1.0–7.0 80%
Receiving yards
34 mean · 29 median · 8–69 80%
Receiving TD
19% 1+
High

Roman Wilson · PIT · WR

Targets
4.8 mean · 4.0 median · 3.0–7.0 80%
Receptions
3.2 mean · 3.0 median · 1.0–5.0 80%
Receiving yards
44 mean · 38 median · 24–64 80%
Receiving TD
29% 1+
Medium

15 individualized projections · 1 baseline projection. Projected role and prior usage remain separate.

Players ruled out or suppressed by current injury and availability evidence are not projected. Player ranges are not produced by, and do not sum to, the PA-1 team scores.

Model comparison

PardonMe Unified

Best historical score model

Unified unavailable — P5 baseline shown.

Full Football

Personnel-aware football model

Full Football unavailable.

P5 V4 baseline

Previous production baseline

PIT 18.3 — NE 26.1

NE · 68.0% win probability

Margin
NE 7.8
Total
44.4

As of Sep 17, 2026 23:48 UTC

Current personnel

Expected lineup & depth

Expected order for this game, using official depth and supported availability.

PITWeek 2 expected order

No supported expected lineup snapshot is available for this game.

NEWeek 2 expected order

No supported expected lineup snapshot is available for this game.

PardonMe is still being built. Projections are independent of sportsbook lines, and missing information remains visible.

Overview

Game comparisonPITNE
Projected points18.326.1
Win probability32.0%68.0%
Depth chartNot confirmed yetNot confirmed yet
Current status74 updates74 updates

Matchup context

Current expectation and observed workload are distinct

Official current depth is available for 2 of 2 clubs; 113 current-depth players have prior observed F2 role evidence and 31 were at least 50% offense/defense snap players in their latest supported observation. None is treated as a current snap-confirmed starter.

NE recent scoring form vs PIT prevention

2025 final-three scoring average 30.0; opponent allowed 16.7.

PIT recent scoring form vs NE prevention

2025 final-three scoring average 17.3; opponent allowed 11.0.