P5 V4 baseline

CIN at HOU

Sunday, September 20 · 12:00 PM CDT

CIN 22.3 — HOU 24.8

HOU slight edge · HOU 53.0%

Projected total 47.1 · Confidence: limited evidence

PardonMe projects HOU slight edge.
Why PardonMe leans HOU →

Current expectation and observed workload are distinct: Official current depth is available for 2 of 2 clubs; 95 current-depth players have prior observed F2 role evidence and 37 were at least 50% offense/defense snap players in their latest supported observation. None is treated as a current snap-confirmed starter.

Player stat models

Player projections

Existing QB, RB, WR and TE statistical models. Each line shows mean · median · 80% range.

Quarterback ranges

Joe Burrow · CIN

Attempts
31.2 mean · 31.0 median · 20.0–43.0 80%
Completions
21.2 mean · 21.0 median · 13.0–29.0 80%
Passing yards
218 mean · 225 median · 109–281 80%
Passing TD
1.63 mean · 78% 1+
Interceptions
0.68 mean · 49% 1+
Medium uncertainty

C.J. Stroud · HOU

Attempts
31.8 mean · 31.0 median · 22.0–43.0 80%
Completions
21.0 mean · 21.0 median · 14.0–29.0 80%
Passing yards
226 mean · 227 median · 159–312 80%
Passing TD
1.37 mean · 73% 1+
Interceptions
0.69 mean · 50% 1+
Medium uncertainty

Running back ranges

Chase Brown · CIN

Opportunities
11.9 mean · 12.0 median · 4.0–19.0 80%
Carries
8.9 mean · 9.0 median · 3.0–15.0 80%
Targets
2.9 mean · 3.0 median · 0.0–6.0 80%
Rushing yards
39 mean · 37 median · 10–70 80%
Receptions
2.3 mean · 2.0 median · 0.0–5.0 80%
Receiving yards
16 mean · 14 median · 0–34 80%
Total TD
32% 1+
High

Samaje Perine · CIN

Opportunities
11.1 mean · 10.0 median · 6.0–17.0 80%
Carries
8.3 mean · 7.0 median · 4.0–14.0 80%
Targets
2.8 mean · 2.0 median · 1.0–5.0 80%
Rushing yards
42 mean · 36 median · 20–72 80%
Receptions
2.0 mean · 2.0 median · 0.0–4.0 80%
Receiving yards
14 mean · 13 median · 0–29 80%
Total TD
30% 1+
High

Woody Marks · HOU

Opportunities
11.6 mean · 11.0 median · 4.0–18.0 80%
Carries
9.8 mean · 10.0 median · 3.0–16.0 80%
Targets
1.8 mean · 1.0 median · 0.0–4.0 80%
Rushing yards
39 mean · 37 median · 12–66 80%
Receptions
1.3 mean · 1.0 median · 0.0–3.0 80%
Receiving yards
9 mean · 7 median · 0–22 80%
Total TD
27% 1+
Medium

David Montgomery · HOU

Opportunities
10.9 mean · 9.0 median · 6.0–18.0 80%
Carries
9.3 mean · 8.0 median · 5.0–15.0 80%
Targets
1.6 mean · 1.0 median · 0.0–4.0 80%
Rushing yards
39 mean · 33 median · 17–67 80%
Receptions
1.3 mean · 1.0 median · 0.0–3.0 80%
Receiving yards
11 mean · 8 median · 0–27 80%
Total TD
29% 1+
High

Receiver and tight end ranges

Mike Gesicki · CIN · TE

Targets
3.1 mean · 3.0 median · 1.0–6.0 80%
Receptions
2.2 mean · 2.0 median · 0.0–4.0 80%
Receiving yards
24 mean · 20 median · 0–42 80%
Receiving TD
17% 1+
High

Drew Sample · CIN · TE

Targets
3.4 mean · 3.0 median · 2.0–5.0 80%
Receptions
2.3 mean · 2.0 median · 1.0–4.0 80%
Receiving yards
17 mean · 13 median · 6–29 80%
Receiving TD
15% 1+
High

Ja'Marr Chase · CIN · WR

Targets
6.3 mean · 5.0 median · 1.0–14.0 80%
Receptions
3.9 mean · 3.0 median · 0.0–9.0 80%
Receiving yards
46 mean · 37 median · 0–107 80%
Receiving TD
23% 1+
High

Tee Higgins · CIN · WR

Targets
5.1 mean · 5.0 median · 1.0–9.0 80%
Receptions
3.0 mean · 3.0 median · 0.0–6.0 80%
Receiving yards
42 mean · 44 median · 0–86 80%
Receiving TD
33% 1+
High

Andrei Iosivas · CIN · WR

Targets
4.6 mean · 4.0 median · 2.0–8.0 80%
Receptions
2.8 mean · 3.0 median · 1.0–5.0 80%
Receiving yards
35 mean · 36 median · 11–62 80%
Receiving TD
20% 1+
High

Foster Moreau · HOU · TE

Targets
3.4 mean · 3.0 median · 1.0–5.0 80%
Receptions
2.6 mean · 2.0 median · 1.0–4.0 80%
Receiving yards
31 mean · 32 median · 9–54 80%
Receiving TD
19% 1+
High

Dalton Schultz · HOU · TE

Targets
3.1 mean · 2.0 median · 0.0–7.0 80%
Receptions
2.4 mean · 1.0 median · 0.0–6.0 80%
Receiving yards
24 mean · 20 median · 0–59 80%
Receiving TD
14% 1+
High

Nico Collins · HOU · WR

Targets
5.4 mean · 6.0 median · 1.0–9.0 80%
Receptions
3.4 mean · 3.0 median · 0.0–7.0 80%
Receiving yards
54 mean · 50 median · 0–113 80%
Receiving TD
23% 1+
High

Xavier Hutchinson · HOU · WR

Targets
5.4 mean · 5.0 median · 3.0–9.0 80%
Receptions
3.2 mean · 3.0 median · 1.0–6.0 80%
Receiving yards
41 mean · 40 median · 15–65 80%
Receiving TD
25% 1+
High

Jared Wayne · HOU · WR

Targets
4.5 mean · 3.0 median · 2.0–9.0 80%
Receptions
2.9 mean · 2.0 median · 1.0–6.0 80%
Receiving yards
35 mean · 33 median · 9–71 80%
Receiving TD
19% 1+
Insufficient Evidence

16 individualized projections. Projected role and prior usage remain separate.

Players ruled out or suppressed by current injury and availability evidence are not projected. Player ranges are not produced by, and do not sum to, the PA-1 team scores.

Model comparison

PardonMe Unified

Best historical score model

Unified unavailable — P5 baseline shown.

Full Football

Personnel-aware football model

Full Football unavailable.

P5 V4 baseline

Previous production baseline

CIN 22.3 — HOU 24.8

HOU · 53.0% win probability

Margin
HOU 2.5
Total
47.1

As of Sep 17, 2026 23:48 UTC

Current personnel

Expected lineup & depth

Expected order for this game, using official depth and supported availability.

CINWeek 2 expected order

No supported expected lineup snapshot is available for this game.

HOUWeek 2 expected order

No supported expected lineup snapshot is available for this game.

PardonMe is still being built. Projections are independent of sportsbook lines, and missing information remains visible.

Overview

Game comparisonCINHOU
Projected points22.324.8
Win probability47.0%53.0%
Depth chartNot confirmed yetNot confirmed yet
Current status37 updates49 updates

Matchup context

Current expectation and observed workload are distinct

Official current depth is available for 2 of 2 clubs; 95 current-depth players have prior observed F2 role evidence and 37 were at least 50% offense/defense snap players in their latest supported observation. None is treated as a current snap-confirmed starter.

HOU recent scoring form vs CIN prevention

2025 final-three scoring average 29.7; opponent allowed 20.3.

CIN recent scoring form vs HOU prevention

2025 final-three scoring average 29.3; opponent allowed 27.3.