P5 V4 baseline

LV at LAC

Sunday, September 20 · 3:05 PM CDT

LV 19.2 — LAC 20.4

Nearly even · LAC 49.0%

Projected total 39.6 · Confidence: limited evidence

PardonMe projects Nearly even.
Why PardonMe leans LAC →

Current expectation and observed workload are distinct: Official current depth is available for 2 of 2 clubs; 106 current-depth players have prior observed F2 role evidence and 34 were at least 50% offense/defense snap players in their latest supported observation. None is treated as a current snap-confirmed starter.

Player stat models

Player projections

Existing QB, RB, WR and TE statistical models. Each line shows mean · median · 80% range.

Quarterback ranges

Kirk Cousins · LV

Attempts
33.5 mean · 34.0 median · 23.0–46.0 80%
Completions
20.2 mean · 20.0 median · 13.0–28.0 80%
Passing yards
223 mean · 209 median · 133–345 80%
Passing TD
1.43 mean · 75% 1+
Interceptions
0.73 mean · 51% 1+
Medium uncertainty

Justin Herbert · LAC

Attempts
34.3 mean · 34.0 median · 25.0–43.0 80%
Completions
21.6 mean · 21.0 median · 15.0–28.0 80%
Passing yards
243 mean · 248 median · 144–347 80%
Passing TD
1.56 mean · 77% 1+
Interceptions
0.79 mean · 54% 1+
Medium uncertainty

Running back ranges

Ashton Jeanty · LV

Opportunities
16.0 mean · 15.0 median · 5.0–24.0 80%
Carries
12.3 mean · 12.0 median · 4.0–20.0 80%
Targets
3.6 mean · 3.0 median · 1.0–7.0 80%
Rushing yards
36 mean · 34 median · 4–65 80%
Receptions
2.2 mean · 2.0 median · 0.0–5.0 80%
Receiving yards
17 mean · 14 median · 0–38 80%
Total TD
30% 1+
Medium

Mike Washington Jr. · LV

Opportunities
12.9 mean · 11.0 median · 6.0–23.0 80%
Carries
10.7 mean · 9.0 median · 5.0–19.0 80%
Targets
2.2 mean · 2.0 median · 0.0–5.0 80%
Rushing yards
48 mean · 40 median · 20–87 80%
Receptions
1.7 mean · 1.0 median · 0.0–4.0 80%
Receiving yards
13 mean · 8 median · 0–30 80%
Total TD
32% 1+
Insufficient Evidence

Omarion Hampton · LAC

Opportunities
15.7 mean · 16.0 median · 9.0–23.0 80%
Carries
12.7 mean · 13.0 median · 7.0–19.0 80%
Targets
3.1 mean · 3.0 median · 1.0–6.0 80%
Rushing yards
47 mean · 44 median · 19–76 80%
Receptions
2.4 mean · 2.0 median · 0.0–5.0 80%
Receiving yards
17 mean · 14 median · 0–33 80%
Total TD
35% 1+
Medium

Receiver and tight end ranges

Brock Bowers · LV · TE

Targets
6.2 mean · 5.0 median · 2.0–12.0 80%
Receptions
4.4 mean · 4.0 median · 1.0–8.0 80%
Receiving yards
48 mean · 45 median · 15–88 80%
Receiving TD
28% 1+
Medium

Michael Mayer · LV · TE

Targets
3.7 mean · 3.0 median · 1.0–7.0 80%
Receptions
2.4 mean · 2.0 median · 0.0–6.0 80%
Receiving yards
24 mean · 23 median · 0–52 80%
Receiving TD
13% 1+
High

Jack Bech · LV · WR

Targets
4.5 mean · 4.0 median · 3.0–8.0 80%
Receptions
3.0 mean · 3.0 median · 1.0–5.0 80%
Receiving yards
36 mean · 34 median · 11–58 80%
Receiving TD
16% 1+
Medium

Jalen Nailor · LV · WR

Targets
5.2 mean · 5.0 median · 3.0–8.0 80%
Receptions
2.9 mean · 3.0 median · 1.0–5.0 80%
Receiving yards
47 mean · 47 median · 15–79 80%
Receiving TD
25% 1+
High

Tre Tucker · LV · WR

Targets
5.8 mean · 6.0 median · 3.0–9.0 80%
Receptions
3.3 mean · 3.0 median · 1.0–6.0 80%
Receiving yards
37 mean · 35 median · 13–58 80%
Receiving TD
18% 1+
High

Charlie Kolar · LAC · TE

Targets
2.0 mean · 2.0 median · 1.0–3.0 80%
Receptions
1.5 mean · 1.0 median · 0.0–3.0 80%
Receiving yards
20 mean · 22 median · 0–34 80%
Receiving TD
14% 1+
Medium

David Njoku · LAC · TE

Targets
2.8 mean · 3.0 median · 0.0–7.0 80%
Receptions
2.2 mean · 2.0 median · 0.0–5.0 80%
Receiving yards
20 mean · 16 median · 0–52 80%
Receiving TD
17% 1+
High

Tre' Harris · LAC · WR

Targets
5.9 mean · 5.0 median · 4.0–8.0 80%
Receptions
3.7 mean · 3.0 median · 2.0–6.0 80%
Receiving yards
40 mean · 33 median · 21–66 80%
Receiving TD
20% 1+
Medium

Quentin Johnston · LAC · WR

Targets
5.3 mean · 5.0 median · 2.0–9.0 80%
Receptions
3.2 mean · 3.0 median · 1.0–6.0 80%
Receiving yards
46 mean · 44 median · 16–87 80%
Receiving TD
30% 1+
High

Ladd McConkey · LAC · WR

Targets
5.7 mean · 5.0 median · 2.0–10.0 80%
Receptions
3.5 mean · 3.0 median · 1.0–7.0 80%
Receiving yards
42 mean · 37 median · 12–86 80%
Receiving TD
27% 1+
High

15 individualized projections. Projected role and prior usage remain separate.

Players ruled out or suppressed by current injury and availability evidence are not projected. Player ranges are not produced by, and do not sum to, the PA-1 team scores.

Model comparison

PardonMe Unified

Best historical score model

Unified unavailable — P5 baseline shown.

Full Football

Personnel-aware football model

Full Football unavailable.

P5 V4 baseline

Previous production baseline

LV 19.2 — LAC 20.4

LAC · 49.0% win probability

Margin
LAC 1.2
Total
39.6

As of Sep 17, 2026 23:48 UTC

Current personnel

Expected lineup & depth

Expected order for this game, using official depth and supported availability.

LVWeek 2 expected order

No supported expected lineup snapshot is available for this game.

LACWeek 2 expected order

No supported expected lineup snapshot is available for this game.

PardonMe is still being built. Projections are independent of sportsbook lines, and missing information remains visible.

Overview

Game comparisonLVLAC
Projected points19.220.4
Win probability51.0%49.0%
Depth chartNot confirmed yetNot confirmed yet
Current status76 updates66 updates

Matchup context

Current expectation and observed workload are distinct

Official current depth is available for 2 of 2 clubs; 106 current-depth players have prior observed F2 role evidence and 34 were at least 50% offense/defense snap players in their latest supported observation. None is treated as a current snap-confirmed starter.

LAC recent scoring form vs LV prevention

2025 final-three scoring average 11.0; opponent allowed 19.7.

LV recent scoring form vs LAC prevention

2025 final-three scoring average 17.0; opponent allowed 21.7.