P5 V4 baseline

MIA at SF

Sunday, September 20 · 3:25 PM CDT

MIA 18.0 — SF 25.4

SF edge · SF 66.6%

Projected total 43.4 · Confidence: limited evidence

PardonMe projects SF edge.
Why PardonMe leans SF →

Current expectation and observed workload are distinct: Official current depth is available for 2 of 2 clubs; 90 current-depth players have prior observed F2 role evidence and 24 were at least 50% offense/defense snap players in their latest supported observation. None is treated as a current snap-confirmed starter.

Player stat models

Player projections

Existing QB, RB, WR and TE statistical models. Each line shows mean · median · 80% range.

Quarterback ranges

Malik Willis · MIA

Attempts
33.2 mean · 31.0 median · 22.0–47.0 80%
Completions
21.6 mean · 21.0 median · 13.0–32.0 80%
Passing yards
257 mean · 247 median · 126–411 80%
Passing TD
1.31 mean · 70% 1+
Interceptions
0.73 mean · 51% 1+
Low uncertainty

Brock Purdy · SF

Attempts
32.5 mean · 32.5 median · 26.0–40.0 80%
Completions
22.0 mean · 22.0 median · 16.0–28.0 80%
Passing yards
241 mean · 233 median · 135–320 80%
Passing TD
1.90 mean · 84% 1+
Interceptions
0.75 mean · 53% 1+
Medium uncertainty

Running back ranges

De'Von Achane · MIA

Opportunities
14.6 mean · 15.0 median · 4.0–22.0 80%
Carries
11.2 mean · 12.0 median · 3.0–17.0 80%
Targets
3.4 mean · 3.0 median · 1.0–6.0 80%
Rushing yards
54 mean · 53 median · 10–91 80%
Receptions
2.5 mean · 2.0 median · 0.0–5.0 80%
Receiving yards
18 mean · 16 median · 0–37 80%
Total TD
34% 1+
High

Ollie Gordon II · MIA

Opportunities
7.0 mean · 5.0 median · 3.0–15.0 80%
Carries
5.9 mean · 5.0 median · 2.0–13.0 80%
Targets
1.1 mean · 1.0 median · 0.0–3.0 80%
Rushing yards
26 mean · 21 median · 10–52 80%
Receptions
0.8 mean · 1.0 median · 0.0–2.0 80%
Receiving yards
6 mean · 6 median · 0–18 80%
Total TD
23% 1+
Medium

Kaelon Black · SF

Opportunities
12.5 mean · 13.0 median · 5.0–21.0 80%
Carries
10.4 mean · 10.0 median · 4.0–17.0 80%
Targets
2.1 mean · 2.0 median · 0.0–4.0 80%
Rushing yards
45 mean · 43 median · 16–77 80%
Receptions
1.6 mean · 1.0 median · 0.0–4.0 80%
Receiving yards
12 mean · 8 median · 0–27 80%
Total TD
31% 1+
Insufficient Evidence

Christian McCaffrey · SF

Opportunities
14.4 mean · 15.0 median · 4.0–24.0 80%
Carries
10.6 mean · 11.0 median · 2.0–18.0 80%
Targets
3.8 mean · 4.0 median · 1.0–7.0 80%
Rushing yards
39 mean · 38 median · 4–72 80%
Receptions
2.5 mean · 2.0 median · 0.0–5.0 80%
Receiving yards
20 mean · 17 median · 0–43 80%
Total TD
34% 1+
High

Receiver and tight end ranges

Greg Dulcich · MIA · TE

Targets
3.6 mean · 3.0 median · 1.0–6.0 80%
Receptions
2.6 mean · 2.0 median · 1.0–5.0 80%
Receiving yards
32 mean · 27 median · 14–60 80%
Receiving TD
16% 1+
Medium

Will Kacmarek · MIA · TE

Targets
3.7 mean · 2.0 median · 2.0–7.0 80%
Receptions
2.4 mean · 2.0 median · 1.0–5.0 80%
Receiving yards
25 mean · 21 median · 10–51 80%
Receiving TD
17% 1+
Insufficient Evidence

Chris Bell · MIA · WR

Targets
4.8 mean · 3.0 median · 2.0–9.0 80%
Receptions
3.0 mean · 2.0 median · 1.0–6.0 80%
Receiving yards
41 mean · 27 median · 14–82 80%
Receiving TD
20% 1+
Insufficient Evidence

Caleb Douglas · MIA · WR

Targets
5.5 mean · 7.0 median · 1.0–8.0 80%
Receptions
3.6 mean · 3.0 median · 1.0–6.0 80%
Receiving yards
52 mean · 44 median · 15–88 80%
Receiving TD
23% 1+
Insufficient Evidence

Jalen Tolbert · MIA · WR

Targets
4.0 mean · 3.0 median · 1.0–8.0 80%
Receptions
2.3 mean · 2.0 median · 0.0–5.0 80%
Receiving yards
32 mean · 24 median · 0–65 80%
Receiving TD
17% 1+
High

George Kittle · SF · TE

Targets
4.1 mean · 4.0 median · 1.0–8.0 80%
Receptions
3.2 mean · 3.0 median · 0.0–7.0 80%
Receiving yards
37 mean · 37 median · 0–71 80%
Receiving TD
21% 1+
High

Jake Tonges · SF · TE

Targets
2.6 mean · 1.0 median · 0.0–7.0 80%
Receptions
2.1 mean · 1.0 median · 0.0–6.0 80%
Receiving yards
21 mean · 18 median · 0–54 80%
Receiving TD
18% 1+
Medium

Mike Evans · SF · WR

Targets
5.4 mean · 6.0 median · 0.0–9.0 80%
Receptions
3.2 mean · 3.0 median · 0.0–6.0 80%
Receiving yards
40 mean · 38 median · 0–77 80%
Receiving TD
26% 1+
High

Demarcus Robinson · SF · WR

Targets
6.0 mean · 6.0 median · 4.0–8.0 80%
Receptions
3.6 mean · 3.0 median · 2.0–6.0 80%
Receiving yards
44 mean · 48 median · 23–72 80%
Receiving TD
23% 1+
High

De'Zhaun Stribling · SF · WR

Targets
4.8 mean · 4.0 median · 1.0–9.0 80%
Receptions
3.0 mean · 2.0 median · 1.0–6.0 80%
Receiving yards
38 mean · 25 median · 13–76 80%
Receiving TD
20% 1+
Insufficient Evidence

15 individualized projections · 1 baseline projection. Projected role and prior usage remain separate.

Players ruled out or suppressed by current injury and availability evidence are not projected. Player ranges are not produced by, and do not sum to, the PA-1 team scores.

Model comparison

PardonMe Unified

Best historical score model

Unified unavailable — P5 baseline shown.

Full Football

Personnel-aware football model

Full Football unavailable.

P5 V4 baseline

Previous production baseline

MIA 18.0 — SF 25.4

SF · 66.6% win probability

Margin
SF 7.5
Total
43.4

As of Sep 17, 2026 23:48 UTC

Current personnel

Expected lineup & depth

Expected order for this game, using official depth and supported availability.

MIAWeek 2 expected order

No supported expected lineup snapshot is available for this game.

SFWeek 2 expected order

No supported expected lineup snapshot is available for this game.

PardonMe is still being built. Projections are independent of sportsbook lines, and missing information remains visible.

Overview

Game comparisonMIASF
Projected points18.025.4
Win probability33.4%66.6%
Depth chartNot confirmed yetNot confirmed yet
Current status35 updates68 updates

Matchup context

Current expectation and observed workload are distinct

Official current depth is available for 2 of 2 clubs; 90 current-depth players have prior observed F2 role evidence and 24 were at least 50% offense/defense snap players in their latest supported observation. None is treated as a current snap-confirmed starter.

MIA recent scoring form vs SF prevention

2025 final-three scoring average 14.3; opponent allowed 19.3.

SF recent scoring form vs MIA prevention

2025 final-three scoring average 24.0; opponent allowed 27.3.