P5 V4 baseline

NYG at LAR

Monday, September 21 · 7:15 PM CDT

NYG 23.4 — LAR 22.7

Nearly even · NYG 57.0%

Projected total 46.1 · Confidence: limited evidence

PardonMe projects Nearly even.
Why PardonMe leans NYG →

Current expectation and observed workload are distinct: Official current depth is available for 2 of 2 clubs; 128 current-depth players have prior observed F2 role evidence and 38 were at least 50% offense/defense snap players in their latest supported observation. None is treated as a current snap-confirmed starter.

Player stat models

Player projections

Existing QB, RB, WR and TE statistical models. Each line shows mean · median · 80% range.

Quarterback ranges

Matthew Stafford · LAR

Attempts
33.0 mean · 33.0 median · 24.0–43.0 80%
Completions
21.7 mean · 21.0 median · 15.0–29.0 80%
Passing yards
251 mean · 256 median · 128–361 80%
Passing TD
1.96 mean · 85% 1+
Interceptions
0.72 mean · 51% 1+
Medium uncertainty

Jaxson Dart · NYG

Attempts
31.6 mean · 32.0 median · 22.0–40.0 80%
Completions
20.5 mean · 21.0 median · 13.0–27.0 80%
Passing yards
217 mean · 220 median · 129–301 80%
Passing TD
1.31 mean · 71% 1+
Interceptions
0.66 mean · 48% 1+
Low uncertainty

Running back ranges

Blake Corum · LAR

Opportunities
11.0 mean · 11.0 median · 5.0–16.0 80%
Carries
10.2 mean · 10.0 median · 5.0–15.0 80%
Targets
0.9 mean · 1.0 median · 0.0–2.0 80%
Rushing yards
50 mean · 46 median · 22–85 80%
Receptions
0.7 mean · 0.0 median · 0.0–2.0 80%
Receiving yards
5 mean · 0 median · 0–15 80%
Total TD
31% 1+
Medium

Kyren Williams · LAR

Opportunities
13.1 mean · 12.0 median · 8.0–22.0 80%
Carries
10.8 mean · 10.0 median · 6.0–19.0 80%
Targets
2.2 mean · 2.0 median · 0.0–4.0 80%
Rushing yards
51 mean · 46 median · 25–87 80%
Receptions
1.4 mean · 1.0 median · 0.0–3.0 80%
Receiving yards
11 mean · 8 median · 0–23 80%
Total TD
34% 1+
High

Devin Singletary · NYG

Opportunities
9.2 mean · 9.0 median · 4.0–15.0 80%
Carries
7.7 mean · 7.0 median · 3.0–13.0 80%
Targets
1.5 mean · 1.0 median · 0.0–3.0 80%
Rushing yards
36 mean · 33 median · 17–59 80%
Receptions
1.2 mean · 1.0 median · 0.0–3.0 80%
Receiving yards
9 mean · 7 median · 0–22 80%
Total TD
30% 1+
High

Cam Skattebo · NYG

Opportunities
9.2 mean · 10.0 median · 0.0–18.0 80%
Carries
7.1 mean · 7.0 median · 0.0–14.0 80%
Targets
2.1 mean · 2.0 median · 0.0–5.0 80%
Rushing yards
36 mean · 38 median · 0–67 80%
Receptions
1.7 mean · 1.0 median · 0.0–4.0 80%
Receiving yards
15 mean · 14 median · 0–34 80%
Total TD
31% 1+
Medium

Receiver and tight end ranges

Davis Allen · LAR · TE

Targets
3.8 mean · 3.0 median · 2.0–6.0 80%
Receptions
2.5 mean · 2.0 median · 1.0–5.0 80%
Receiving yards
22 mean · 18 median · 7–44 80%
Receiving TD
17% 1+
Medium

Colby Parkinson · LAR · TE

Targets
3.7 mean · 4.0 median · 1.0–6.0 80%
Receptions
2.6 mean · 2.0 median · 1.0–5.0 80%
Receiving yards
27 mean · 22 median · 2–53 80%
Receiving TD
20% 1+
High

Davante Adams · LAR · WR

Targets
4.9 mean · 5.0 median · 2.0–7.0 80%
Receptions
3.1 mean · 3.0 median · 1.0–5.0 80%
Receiving yards
39 mean · 39 median · 14–65 80%
Receiving TD
40% 1+
High

CJ Daniels · LAR · WR

Targets
4.8 mean · 4.0 median · 1.0–9.0 80%
Receptions
3.0 mean · 2.0 median · 1.0–6.0 80%
Receiving yards
38 mean · 25 median · 13–76 80%
Receiving TD
20% 1+
Insufficient Evidence

Puka Nacua · LAR · WR

Targets
5.1 mean · 6.0 median · 0.0–8.0 80%
Receptions
4.0 mean · 4.0 median · 0.0–7.0 80%
Receiving yards
54 mean · 58 median · 0–100 80%
Receiving TD
28% 1+
High

Theo Johnson · NYG · TE

Targets
3.7 mean · 3.0 median · 1.0–6.0 80%
Receptions
2.0 mean · 2.0 median · 0.0–4.0 80%
Receiving yards
24 mean · 25 median · 0–49 80%
Receiving TD
16% 1+
Medium

Isaiah Likely · NYG · TE

Targets
3.2 mean · 3.0 median · 1.0–6.0 80%
Receptions
2.5 mean · 2.0 median · 1.0–5.0 80%
Receiving yards
29 mean · 23 median · 11–56 80%
Receiving TD
15% 1+
High

Malachi Fields · NYG · WR

Targets
5.5 mean · 5.0 median · 2.0–9.0 80%
Receptions
3.4 mean · 3.0 median · 1.0–6.0 80%
Receiving yards
42 mean · 38 median · 13–75 80%
Receiving TD
23% 1+
Insufficient Evidence

Darnell Mooney · NYG · WR

Targets
5.0 mean · 5.0 median · 2.0–8.0 80%
Receptions
2.3 mean · 2.0 median · 1.0–4.0 80%
Receiving yards
34 mean · 29 median · 15–58 80%
Receiving TD
18% 1+
High

Malik Nabers · NYG · WR

Targets
4.8 mean · 5.0 median · 0.0–9.0 80%
Receptions
3.4 mean · 3.0 median · 0.0–7.0 80%
Receiving yards
44 mean · 41 median · 0–79 80%
Receiving TD
25% 1+
Medium

15 individualized projections · 1 baseline projection. Projected role and prior usage remain separate.

Players ruled out or suppressed by current injury and availability evidence are not projected. Player ranges are not produced by, and do not sum to, the PA-1 team scores.

Model comparison

PardonMe Unified

Best historical score model

Unified unavailable — P5 baseline shown.

Full Football

Personnel-aware football model

Full Football unavailable.

P5 V4 baseline

Previous production baseline

NYG 23.4 — LAR 22.7

NYG · 57.0% win probability

Margin
NYG 0.7
Total
46.1

As of Sep 17, 2026 23:48 UTC

Current personnel

Expected lineup & depth

Expected order for this game, using official depth and supported availability.

NYGWeek 2 expected order

No supported expected lineup snapshot is available for this game.

LARWeek 2 expected order

No supported expected lineup snapshot is available for this game.

PardonMe is still being built. Projections are independent of sportsbook lines, and missing information remains visible.

Overview

Game comparisonNYGLAR
Projected points23.422.7
Win probability57.0%43.0%
Depth chartNot confirmed yetNot confirmed yet
Current status59 updates58 updates

Matchup context

Current expectation and observed workload are distinct

Official current depth is available for 2 of 2 clubs; 128 current-depth players have prior observed F2 role evidence and 38 were at least 50% offense/defense snap players in their latest supported observation. None is treated as a current snap-confirmed starter.

NYG recent scoring form vs LAR prevention

2025 final-three scoring average 32.0; opponent allowed 24.7.

LAR recent scoring form vs NYG prevention

2025 final-three scoring average 22.7; opponent allowed 15.7.