P5 V4 baseline

DEN at SF

Sunday, October 4 · 3:25 PM CDT

DEN 19.2 — SF 26.5

SF edge · SF 66.6%

Projected total 45.7 · Confidence: limited evidence

PardonMe projects SF edge.
Why PardonMe leans SF →

Current expectation and observed workload are distinct: Official current depth is available for 2 of 2 clubs; 99 current-depth players have prior observed F2 role evidence and 3 were at least 50% offense/defense snap players in their latest supported observation. None is treated as a current snap-confirmed starter.

Player stat models

Player projections

Existing QB, RB, WR and TE statistical models. Each line shows mean · median · 80% range.

Quarterback ranges

Bo Nix · DEN

Attempts
33.0 mean · 33.0 median · 22.0–44.0 80%
Completions
22.2 mean · 22.0 median · 14.0–30.0 80%
Passing yards
235 mean · 224 median · 142–329 80%
Passing TD
1.18 mean · 68% 1+
Interceptions
0.69 mean · 49% 1+
Medium uncertainty

Brock Purdy · SF

Attempts
31.6 mean · 32.0 median · 25.0–39.0 80%
Completions
21.4 mean · 21.0 median · 15.0–28.0 80%
Passing yards
235 mean · 228 median · 131–313 80%
Passing TD
1.85 mean · 83% 1+
Interceptions
0.73 mean · 51% 1+
Medium uncertainty

Running back ranges

J.K. Dobbins · DEN

Opportunities
12.3 mean · 12.0 median · 8.0–17.0 80%
Carries
11.1 mean · 11.0 median · 6.0–15.0 80%
Targets
1.2 mean · 1.0 median · 0.0–3.0 80%
Rushing yards
48 mean · 47 median · 24–72 80%
Receptions
1.0 mean · 1.0 median · 0.0–2.0 80%
Receiving yards
6 mean · 6 median · 0–15 80%
Total TD
29% 1+
High

RJ Harvey · DEN

Opportunities
9.0 mean · 9.0 median · 2.0–18.0 80%
Carries
6.2 mean · 6.0 median · 0.0–13.0 80%
Targets
2.8 mean · 2.0 median · 0.0–6.0 80%
Rushing yards
26 mean · 23 median · 0–54 80%
Receptions
2.0 mean · 2.0 median · 0.0–4.0 80%
Receiving yards
14 mean · 12 median · 0–33 80%
Total TD
30% 1+
Medium

Kaelon Black · SF

Opportunities
11.1 mean · 10.0 median · 4.0–20.0 80%
Carries
9.4 mean · 8.0 median · 3.0–17.0 80%
Targets
1.7 mean · 1.0 median · 0.0–4.0 80%
Rushing yards
40 mean · 34 median · 13–74 80%
Receptions
1.3 mean · 1.0 median · 0.0–3.0 80%
Receiving yards
10 mean · 7 median · 0–22 80%
Total TD
27% 1+
Insufficient Evidence

Christian McCaffrey · SF

Opportunities
12.3 mean · 13.0 median · 2.0–22.0 80%
Carries
8.8 mean · 9.0 median · 1.0–16.0 80%
Targets
3.5 mean · 3.0 median · 1.0–7.0 80%
Rushing yards
33 mean · 32 median · 0–64 80%
Receptions
2.1 mean · 2.0 median · 0.0–5.0 80%
Receiving yards
17 mean · 15 median · 0–39 80%
Total TD
29% 1+
High

Receiver and tight end ranges

Evan Engram · DEN · TE

Targets
3.2 mean · 3.0 median · 1.0–7.0 80%
Receptions
2.3 mean · 2.0 median · 0.0–5.0 80%
Receiving yards
24 mean · 20 median · 0–49 80%
Receiving TD
14% 1+
High

Adam Trautman · DEN · TE

Targets
3.3 mean · 3.0 median · 2.0–5.0 80%
Receptions
2.5 mean · 2.0 median · 1.0–4.0 80%
Receiving yards
24 mean · 19 median · 9–38 80%
Receiving TD
16% 1+
High

Lil'Jordan Humphrey · DEN · WR

Targets
4.7 mean · 4.0 median · 2.0–9.0 80%
Receptions
3.0 mean · 3.0 median · 1.0–5.0 80%
Receiving yards
36 mean · 33 median · 10–67 80%
Receiving TD
23% 1+
High

Courtland Sutton · DEN · WR

Targets
5.1 mean · 4.0 median · 1.0–9.0 80%
Receptions
2.8 mean · 3.0 median · 0.0–6.0 80%
Receiving yards
38 mean · 40 median · 0–81 80%
Receiving TD
20% 1+
High

Jaylen Waddle · DEN · WR

Targets
4.4 mean · 5.0 median · 0.0–7.0 80%
Receptions
3.1 mean · 3.0 median · 0.0–6.0 80%
Receiving yards
48 mean · 45 median · 0–90 80%
Receiving TD
23% 1+
High

George Kittle · SF · TE

Targets
4.2 mean · 4.0 median · 1.0–8.0 80%
Receptions
3.0 mean · 3.0 median · 0.0–6.0 80%
Receiving yards
33 mean · 33 median · 0–66 80%
Receiving TD
20% 1+
High

Brayden Willis · SF · TE

Targets
0.9 mean · 0.0 median · 0.0–4.0 80%
Receptions
0.6 mean · 0.0 median · 0.0–2.0 80%
Receiving yards
7 mean · 0 median · 0–31 80%
Receiving TD
7% 1+
Insufficient Evidence

Mike Evans · SF · WR

Targets
5.4 mean · 6.0 median · 0.0–9.0 80%
Receptions
3.1 mean · 3.0 median · 0.0–6.0 80%
Receiving yards
40 mean · 38 median · 0–77 80%
Receiving TD
25% 1+
High

KhaDarel Hodge · SF · WR

Targets
3.5 mean · 3.0 median · 2.0–8.0 80%
Receptions
2.1 mean · 2.0 median · 0.0–4.0 80%
Receiving yards
31 mean · 24 median · 0–65 80%
Receiving TD
18% 1+
High

15 individualized projections. Projected role and prior usage remain separate.

Players ruled out or suppressed by current injury and availability evidence are not projected. Player ranges are not produced by, and do not sum to, the PA-1 team scores.

Model comparison

PardonMe Unified

Best historical score model

Unified unavailable — P5 baseline shown.

Full Football

Personnel-aware football model

Full Football unavailable.

P5 V4 baseline

Previous production baseline

DEN 19.2 — SF 26.5

SF · 66.6% win probability

Margin
SF 7.3
Total
45.7

As of Sep 30, 2026 23:46 UTC

Current personnel

Expected lineup & depth

Expected order for this game, using official depth and supported availability.

DENWeek 4 expected order

No supported expected lineup snapshot is available for this game.

QB: Availability for this game is not confirmed.

RB: Availability for this game is not confirmed.

TE: Availability for this game is not confirmed.

WR: Availability for this game is not confirmed.

WR: Availability for this game is not confirmed.

WR: Availability for this game is not confirmed.

Official depth & availability evidence

QB official #1 — Bo Nix · Current status: Transaction Effective

QB official #2 — Jarrett Stidham · Availability unknown

QB official #3 — Sam Ehlinger · Current status: Transaction Effective

RB official #1 — J.K. Dobbins · Full

RB official #2 — RJ Harvey · Availability unknown

RB official #3 — Tyler Badie · Availability unknown

TE official #1 — Evan Engram · Availability unknown

TE official #2 — Adam Trautman · Current status: Transaction Effective

TE official #3 — Nate Adkins · Availability unknown

TE official #4 — Dallen Bentley · Current status: Transaction Effective

WR official #1 — Marvin Mims Jr. · Full

WR official #2 — Troy Franklin · Availability unknown

WR official #1 — Jaylen Waddle · Full

WR official #2 — Lil'Jordan Humphrey · Availability unknown

WR official #1 — Courtland Sutton · Availability unknown

WR official #2 — Pat Bryant · Availability unknown

SFWeek 4 expected order

No supported expected lineup snapshot is available for this game.

QB: Availability for this game is not confirmed.

RB: Availability for this game is not confirmed.

TE: Availability for this game is not confirmed.

WR: Availability for this game is not confirmed.

WR: Availability for this game is not confirmed.

Official depth & availability evidence

QB official #1 — Brock Purdy · Availability unknown

QB official #2 — Mac Jones · Availability unknown

QB official #3 — Kurtis Rourke · Inactive for Week 2

RB official #1 — Christian McCaffrey · Did not participate

RB official #2 — Kaelon Black · Availability unknown

RB official #3 — Jordan James · Availability unknown

TE official #1 — George Kittle · Reserve status: Active Pup

TE official #2 — Luke Farrell · Availability unknown

TE official #3 — Brayden Willis · Availability unknown

WR official #1 — Mike Evans · Did not participate

WR official #2 — Jacob Cowing · Availability unknown

WR official #3 — KhaDarel Hodge · Did not participate

WR official #1 — Deebo Samuel Sr. · Availability unknown

WR official #2 — Jordan Watkins · Inactive for Week 2

PardonMe is still being built. Projections are independent of sportsbook lines, and missing information remains visible.

Overview

Game comparisonDENSF
Projected points19.226.5
Win probability33.4%66.6%
Depth chartNot confirmed yetNot confirmed yet
Current status67 updates68 updates

Matchup context

Current expectation and observed workload are distinct

Official current depth is available for 2 of 2 clubs; 99 current-depth players have prior observed F2 role evidence and 3 were at least 50% offense/defense snap players in their latest supported observation. None is treated as a current snap-confirmed starter.

SF recent scoring form vs DEN prevention

2025 final-three scoring average 32.7; opponent allowed 23.3.

DEN recent scoring form vs SF prevention

2025 final-three scoring average 20.0; opponent allowed 16.7.